Posted by CV Writers on Thursday, 27 October 2011
An interesting article has been published by the recruitment
intelligence site Ri5, which if taken on board by the recruiting
community, could have big ramifications for recruitment in general and
the way CVs are structured and written.
The article reports on some research carried out by The Chemistry
Group which says that 75% of recruiters are getting recruitment wrong
by placing too much weight on past experience as an indicator of future
performance. These mistakes end up costing the economy billions of
pounds a year through unsuitable people being hired. And because there
is a reluctance to change the system, the same mistakes are made over
and over. A far better predictor of future performance are factors such
as 'intellect, values, motivations and behaviours' (see www.ri5.co.uk).
This perseverance with past experience probably explains the results of
another recent piece of research by Second Careers who found that the
first place many recruiters go to in a CV is 'career history'.
I'm sure we've all seen many an experienced professional being hired
and for things not to work out. Not because of not having the technical
skills, just having different values and behaviours − that usually
aren't aligned with the bosses. You see it all the time. Even in
football, players with proven experience might move to a new club and
things just don't work out: think Juan Sebastien Veron at Man Utd or
even Tevez at Man City. They just don't 'fit'. Mind you, where does
Tevez fit?
A CV is often the first glimpse an employer will get of a prospective employee, so how do you convey the right 'fit'?
The generally accepted CV structure is reverse chronological where
the reader dips straight into a persons career history. However, surely
it's better to paint a picture of the candidate first? A well written
Professional Profile should convey how a person creates success with
their own individual values and behaviours.
This can then be backed up in a second section of either 'key skills
and competencies' or 'key achievements'. Specific examples can be used
of how a person has demonstrated the right competencies and behaviours
to overcome challenges or create success. And when described under
labels that mirror the organisation's own corporate values, well, you'd
hope the recruiter will now be playing close attention.
A CV structured this way enables a recruiter to get a much better
idea of a candidates attitude, values and behaviours than a CV that
immediately goes in to a persons career history. The question is whether
recruiters will change their ways? Until the audience for CVs
significantly shifts their position on what's important when hiring
people, then the reverse chronological CV will hold sway. And the same
mistakes will be made over and over.
